Lazzaro v. County of Nassau

240 A.D.2d 546, 659 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6613
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 16, 1997·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated June 19, 1996, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiff’s motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum which was served upon a nonparty, Joseph Lazzaro.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly found that the subpoena duces tecum which the defendants served upon a nonparty, Joseph Lazzaro, was facially defective because it neither contained nor was accompanied by a notice stating the "circumstances or reasons such disclosure is * * * required” (CPLR 3101 [a] [4]; see, Bigman v Dime Sav. Bank, 138 AD2d 438).

The defendants’ remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lazzaro v. County of Nassau, 240 A.D.2d 546, 659 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

240 A.D.2d 546 (Lazzaro v. County of Nassau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Express Property Casualty Co. v. Vinci
63 A.D.3d 1055 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Moran v. McCarthy, Safrath & Carbone, P.C.
31 A.D.3d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Wolf v. Wolf
300 A.D.2d 473 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)