Lazuran v. Citimortgage, Inc.

35 So. 3d 189, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8183, 2010 WL 2292132
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 2010
Docket4D09-1340
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 35 So. 3d 189 (Lazuran v. Citimortgage, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lazuran v. Citimortgage, Inc., 35 So. 3d 189, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8183, 2010 WL 2292132 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

GERBER, J.

We reverse the circuit court’s final summary judgment of foreclosure against Ste-lian Lazuran (the “defendant”). Citimort-gage’s complaint alleged that all conditions precedent to the mortgage note’s acceleration had been fulfilled, and Citimortgage’s affidavit in support of its motion for summary judgment stated “[t]hat each and every allegation in the Complaint is true.” Such a conclusory allegation is insufficient to refute the defendant’s affirmative de *190 fense that Citimortgage failed to provide him with notice of the acceleration pursuant to the procedures specified in paragraph 22 of the mortgage. Therefore, reversal is required. See Frost v. Regions Bank, 15 So.3d 905, 906-07 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (“Because the bank did not meet its burden to refute the Frosts’ lack of notice and opportunity to cure defense, the bank is not entitled to final final summary judgment of foreclosure.”).

Reversed.

POLEN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Godshalk v. Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
81 So. 3d 626 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Toler v. BANK OF AMERICA, NAT. ASS'N
78 So. 3d 699 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Taylor v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
74 So. 3d 1115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 So. 3d 189, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8183, 2010 WL 2292132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lazuran-v-citimortgage-inc-fladistctapp-2010.