Lazic v. National Croatian Society
This text of 64 Pa. Super. 169 (Lazic v. National Croatian Society) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
On the first trial of this case, the plaintiff recovered a verdict after a fair submission of the controverted facts to the jury. A new trial was granted, when the court directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, reserving the question of law as to whether there was a variance in the [172]*172allegation and proof, and upon consideration of this question, the court refused another trial, and overruled the motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.
The reasons given by the trial judge fully and fairly answer the argument of the appellant, and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 Pa. Super. 169, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lazic-v-national-croatian-society-pasuperct-1916.