Lazenby, Henry Thomas v. State
This text of Lazenby, Henry Thomas v. State (Lazenby, Henry Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Opinion filed February 27, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-00159-CR
HENRY THOMAS LAZENBY, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 179th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 933,594
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
After a guilty plea, appellant was convicted of the offense of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and sentenced to three years= confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice--Institutional Division on December 18, 2002. No motion for new trial was filed. Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed until January 31, 2003.
A defendant=s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal which complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Opinion filed February 27, 2003.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Hudson, and Frost.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lazenby, Henry Thomas v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lazenby-henry-thomas-v-state-texapp-2003.