Lazarus v. Steinhardt
133 F. 522, 67 C.C.A. 243, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4446
Opinion
According to the record, the fund in the hands of the lower court, and out of which Mrs. Max Lazarus, the appellant, claims a homestead, belongs in equity, first, to the creditors of the Lazarus Jewelry Company, and, second, to the complaining creditors in Steinhardt v. Max Lazarus and the Lazarus Jewelry Company. For this reason, and because there is not enough to go around and leave any fund applicable to the Lazarus homestead, the ruling of the Circuit Court was correct, and the decree appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lazarus v. Steinhardt, 133 F. 522, 67 C.C.A. 243, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4446 (5th Cir. 1904).
133 F. 522 (Lazarus v. Steinhardt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.