Lazarus v. Steinhardt

Fifth Circuit

Lazarus v. Steinhardt

133 F. 522, 67 C.C.A. 243, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4446

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 7, 1904

DocketNo. 1,404

StatusPublished

This text of 133 F. 522 (Lazarus v. Steinhardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lazarus v. Steinhardt, 133 F. 522, 67 C.C.A. 243, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4446 (5th Cir. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

According to the record, the fund in the hands of the lower court, and out of which Mrs. Max Lazarus, the appellant, claims a homestead, belongs in equity, first, to the creditors of the Lazarus Jewelry Company, and, second, to the complaining creditors in Steinhardt v. Max Lazarus and the Lazarus Jewelry Company. For this reason, and because there is not enough to go around and leave any fund applicable to the Lazarus homestead, the ruling of the Circuit Court was correct, and the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

According to the record, the fund in the hands of the lower court, and out of which Mrs. Max Lazarus, the appellant, claims a homestead, belongs in equity, first, to the creditors of the Lazarus Jewelry Company, and, second, to the complaining creditors in Steinhardt v. Max Lazarus and the Lazarus Jewelry Company. For this reason, and because there is not enough to go around and leave any fund applicable to the Lazarus homestead, the ruling of the Circuit Court was correct, and the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 F. 522, 67 C.C.A. 243, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lazarus-v-steinhardt-ca5-1904.