Lazarro v. Black Rock Milling Co.
This text of 211 A.D. 820 (Lazarro v. Black Rock Milling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A reasonable construction of the entire evidence is that although the claimant was working in a constant atmosphere of dust there was some particular time when a foreign substance entered his right eye and destroyed its vision. The ease is similar to Guyon v. Standard Wall Paper Co. (209 App. Div. 708). The award, however, is slightly excessive. It is based on a weekly wage of twenty-eight dollars and eighty-five cents. The only evidence of the weekly wage of claimant is contained in the employer’s report of injury which states that his [821]*821average earnings were five dollars per day for five and one-half day's per week, or twenty-seven dollars and fifty cents per week, making the correct weekly rate o compensation eighteen dollars and thirty-three cents, instead of nineteen dollars and twenty-three ceDts as awarded. Award modified by reducing the weekly rate of compensation to eighteen dollars and thirty-three cents, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
211 A.D. 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lazarro-v-black-rock-milling-co-nyappdiv-1924.