Lazard v. E LA State Hospital

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 19, 2000
Docket00-30632
StatusUnpublished

This text of Lazard v. E LA State Hospital (Lazard v. E LA State Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lazard v. E LA State Hospital, (5th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-30632 Conference Calendar

KIP LAZARD, also known as Kip Lozard,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

EAST LOUISIANA STATE HOSPITAL,

Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-CV-740-C -------------------- October 18, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kip Lazard has filed a motion to be transferred to a federal

facility. He has failed to show that his circumstances warrant

this transfer. See Carswell v. Wainwright, 413 F.2d 1044, 1045

(5th Cir. 1969). Consequently, the motion is denied.

Lazard also appeals the district court’s dismissal of his

§ 1983 suit for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

Lazard has failed to brief this issue, as he has provided neither

argument nor authorities to show that the district court erred in

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-30632 -2-

dismissing his suit. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225

(5th Cir. 1993); Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9). Accordingly, this

appeal is dismissed as frivolous.

This dismissal of a frivolous appeal constitutes one strike

against Lazard for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba

v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). If two other

district court actions or appeals filed by Jackson are dismissed

as frivolous, he will be barred from bringing a civil action or

appeal as a prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis unless he is

under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).

MOTION DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. 5TH CIR. R.

42.2. SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lazard v. E LA State Hospital, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lazard-v-e-la-state-hospital-ca5-2000.