Layton v. State

135 S.W. 557, 61 Tex. Crim. 507, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 134
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 8, 1911
DocketNo. 904.
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 135 S.W. 557 (Layton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Layton v. State, 135 S.W. 557, 61 Tex. Crim. 507, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 134 (Tex. 1911).

Opinions

HARPER, Judge.

—Motion is made by the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that the recognizance is not sufficient to give this court jurisdiction. An inspection of the recognizance discloses that the motion is well taken. See Bird v. State, Switzer v. State, and Hardin v. State, this day decided. The motion is sustained, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Shepard
67 S.W.2d 91 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1933)
King v. State
51 S.W.2d 325 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Caldarera v. State
53 S.W.2d 485 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Johnson v. State
8 S.W.2d 127 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Heffernarn v. State
266 S.W. 1116 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Heffnarn v. State
266 S.W. 507 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S.W. 557, 61 Tex. Crim. 507, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/layton-v-state-texcrimapp-1911.