Layton v. State
135 S.W. 557, 61 Tex. Crim. 507, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 134
Opinions
—Motion is made by the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that the recognizance is not sufficient to give this court jurisdiction. An inspection of the recognizance discloses that the motion is well taken. See Bird v. State, Switzer v. State, and Hardin v. State, this day decided. The motion is sustained, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Layton v. State, 135 S.W. 557, 61 Tex. Crim. 507, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 134 (Tex. 1911).
135 S.W. 557 (Layton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Shepard
67 S.W.2d 91 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1933)
King v. State
51 S.W.2d 325 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Caldarera v. State
53 S.W.2d 485 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Johnson v. State
8 S.W.2d 127 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Heffernarn v. State
266 S.W. 1116 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Heffnarn v. State
266 S.W. 507 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)