Layton v. State
This text of 135 S.W. 557 (Layton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
—Motion is made by the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that the recognizance is not sufficient to give this court jurisdiction. An inspection of the recognizance discloses that the motion is well taken. See Bird v. State, Switzer v. State, and Hardin v. State, this day decided. The motion is sustained, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 S.W. 557, 61 Tex. Crim. 507, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/layton-v-state-texcrimapp-1911.