Layton v. State
This text of 790 So. 2d 612 (Layton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CONFESSION OF ERROR
Pursuant to the State’s confession of error, we reverse the defendant’s conviction and sentence and remand for a new trial. The State properly concedes that a reasonable doubt existed as to whether one or more of the jurors, to whom a cause challenge was denied, possessed an impartial state of mind, Van Poyck v. Singletary, 715 So.2d 930, 931 (Fla.1998)(citing Hill v. State, 477 So.2d 553 (Fla.1985)), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1018, 119 S.Ct. 1252, 143 L.Ed.2d 349 (1999), and that this error was properly preserved.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
790 So. 2d 612, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11127, 2001 WL 883641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/layton-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.