Layton v. Carman
3 N.J.L. 163
Opinion
The objection to the validity of this judgment was, that there was no state of demand filed ; in fact, no [*] proceedings had, preceding the judgment, and the judgment entered in figures: for these reasons, Judgment reversed,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Layton v. Carman, 3 N.J.L. 163 (N.J. 1807).
3 N.J.L. 163 (Layton v. Carman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.