Layton & Layton, Inc. v. Lawson
86 A. 520, 27 Del. 143, 4 Boyce 143, 1913 Del. LEXIS 27
This text of 86 A. 520 (Layton & Layton, Inc. v. Lawson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Layton & Layton, Inc. v. Lawson, 86 A. 520, 27 Del. 143, 4 Boyce 143, 1913 Del. LEXIS 27 (Del. Ct. App. 1913).
Opinion
For the purposes of this motion the averments of the affidavit must be considered to be true, and, if true, the defense of former recovery as set forth in the affidavit was sufficiently stated to preclude judgment upon the affidavit of demand at the first term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
86 A. 520, 27 Del. 143, 4 Boyce 143, 1913 Del. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/layton-layton-inc-v-lawson-delsuperct-1913.