Layton, Daniel
Opinion
I would hold that the appellant's statements that he had taken Valium and that it was probably not a good idea to have been drinking "on top" of it were admissible. They were not scientific evidence, and the Rule 702 gatekeeping requirements should not exclude them.
I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
En Banc.
Delivered: February 4, 2009.
Publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Layton, Daniel, (Tex. 2009).
Layton, Daniel (Layton, Daniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.