Layton, Daniel

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 4, 2009·No. PD-0408-07·Published

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. PD 0408-07
DANIEL LAYTON, Appellant


v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS




ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF CASE 01-05-00950-CR

OF THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS,

HARRIS COUNTY

Womack, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

I would hold that the appellant's statements that he had taken Valium and that it was probably not a good idea to have been drinking "on top" of it were admissible. They were not scientific evidence, and the Rule 702 gatekeeping requirements should not exclude them.

I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

En Banc.

Delivered: February 4, 2009.

Publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Layton, Daniel, (Tex. 2009).

Layton, Daniel (Layton, Daniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.