Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Layne v. State

Layne v. State

867 So. 2d 1221, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2913, 2004 WL 438683
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 11, 2004
DocketNo. 1D04-0182
StatusPublished

This text of 867 So. 2d 1221 (Layne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Layne v. State, 867 So. 2d 1221, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2913, 2004 WL 438683 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the court’s order of January 20, 2004, the court has determined that the notice of appeal was not timely filed because the motion for reconsideration did not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal of the order denying appellant’s 3.800(a) motion. See Griffis v. State, 593 [1222]*1222So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The appeal is hereby dismissed.

DISMISSED.

BARFIELD, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griffis v. State
593 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
867 So. 2d 1221, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2913, 2004 WL 438683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/layne-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.