Layne v. State
867 So. 2d 1221, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2913, 2004 WL 438683
Opinion
Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the court’s order of January 20, 2004, the court has determined that the notice of appeal was not timely filed because the motion for reconsideration did not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal of the order denying appellant’s 3.800(a) motion. See Griffis v. State, 593 [1222] So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The appeal is hereby dismissed.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Layne v. State, 867 So. 2d 1221, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2913, 2004 WL 438683 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
867 So. 2d 1221 (Layne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Griffis v. State
593 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)