Layne v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

273 A.D.2d 52, 708 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6384

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered February 19, 1999, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondents’ determination denying petitioner a disability pension, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Medical Board’s finding that petitioner is not disabled is supported by credible evidence, including its own examination of petitioner as well as an examination performed by an outside physician (see, Matter of DeNaro v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 265 AD2d 215, citing, inter alia, Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756, 760). Concur — Tom, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Layne v. New York City Employees' Retirement System, 273 A.D.2d 52, 708 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6384 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

273 A.D.2d 52 (Layne v. New York City Employees' Retirement System) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Borenstein v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
673 N.E.2d 899 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
DeNaro v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
265 A.D.2d 215 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)