Laymance v. Shourd

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

JEREMY DEAN LAYMANCE PLAINTIFF

v. No. 4:17-cv-303-DPM-JTR RICKY SHOURD, Sheriff, White County Sheriff Office; PAUL HOFSTEAD, Deputy, White County Sheriff Office; SHARON VAN COMPERNOLLE, Great Grandparent of Child; JOHN VAN COMPERNOLLE, Great Grandparent of Child; CASEY WALKER, Agent, Department of Human Services; WHITE COUNTY, ARKANSAS; and ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANTS

ORDER Unopposed partial recommendation, Ne 38, adopted. FED. R. CIv. P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes); see also Lawson v. Simmons Sporting Goods, Inc., 2019 Ark. 84, 569 S.W.3d 865. Motion to dismiss, Ne 34, granted. Laymance’s remaining claims against Sharon and John Van Compernolle are dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge (0 Mom f~ol4