Layman v. State
384 S.W.2d 145, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1141
Opinion
The offense is felony theft; the punishment, 10 years.
It appears from the transcript that appellant is at large upon recognizance on appeal which is not set out in the transcript.
In the absence of a recognizance or bond substantially in the form required by statute, the appellant not being confined in jail, this court is without jurisdiction to enter any order except to dismiss the appeal. Carter v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 123, 338 S.W.2d 731; Reid v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 40, 289 S.W.2d 237.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Layman v. State, 384 S.W.2d 145, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1141 (Tex. 1964).
384 S.W.2d 145 (Layman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reid v. State
289 S.W.2d 237 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)
Carter v. State
170 Tex. Crim. 123 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Carter v. State
338 S.W.2d 731 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)