Layman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Layman v. State

72 S.W.2d 905

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 13, 1934

DocketNo. 16880

StatusPublished

This text of 72 S.W.2d 905 (Layman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Layman v. State, 72 S.W.2d 905 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The record is here without any bills of exception. The facts sufficiently show a sale of intoxicating liquor by the appellant. The testimony is in a condition of conflict, but the jury have seen fit to believe that of the state, and, there being evidence sufficient to justify their conclusion, we are without right to disturb their verdict.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The record is here without any bills of exception. The facts sufficiently show a sale of intoxicating liquor by the appellant. The testimony is in a condition of conflict, but the jury have seen fit to believe that of the state, and, there being evidence sufficient to justify their conclusion, we are without right to disturb their verdict.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 S.W.2d 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/layman-v-state-texcrimapp-1934.