Layman v. Buck
This text of 61 N.E. 203 (Layman v. Buck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Neither the pleadings nor the evidence are in the record.
Counsel for adversary parties differ as to the theory of the complaint and the action. Counsel for appellants assert that the action is to quiet title and for possession; for appellee, that it is to quiet title only. Appellants were plaintiffs below.
[321]*321The error assigned is that the court erred in its conclusions of law. If the action is to quiet title it should fail because not brought within the fifteen years fixed by the statute, and the judgment should be affirmed. Upon a record so meager, this court is not justified in disturbing the judgment of the trial court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 N.E. 203, 27 Ind. App. 320, 1901 Ind. App. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/layman-v-buck-indctapp-1901.