Layman v. Binns

530 N.E.2d 382, 39 Ohio St. 3d 605, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 357
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Layman v. Binns. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Ohio St. 3d 176
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 9, 1988·No. No. 87-124·Published

Opinion

This cause came on for further consideration upon the request of Robert A. Pratt, attorney for plaintiffs-appéllees, for a clarification of the order of this court in the above-styled case, dated August 31, 1988. Upon consideration thereof, it is the intention of the court to assess liability for the payment of garnisheed funds only to parties to the action before the court or to any person holding funds in trust for plaintiffs-appellees. (See [1988], 35 Ohio St. 3d 176, 519 N.E. 2d 642.)

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Layman v. Binns, 530 N.E.2d 382, 39 Ohio St. 3d 605, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 357 (Ohio 1988).

530 N.E.2d 382 (Layman v. Binns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Layman v. Binns
519 N.E.2d 642 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)