Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Layden v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.

Layden v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.

148 N.Y.S. 1126
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 5, 1914
StatusPublished

This text of 148 N.Y.S. 1126 (Layden v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Layden v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 148 N.Y.S. 1126 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion denied, with leave to apply to the Special Term." While the Appellate Division, as a condition of not dismissing an appeal, may limit the time to serve a case or perfect an appeal, motions to extend the time to make and serve a case are properly made at Special Term. Odell v. McGrath, 16 App. Div. 103, 45 N. Y. Supp. 119; Matter of Stafford, 21 App. Div. 476, 47 N. Y. Supp. 688.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Odell v. McGrath
16 A.D. 103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Wetter v. Erichs
21 A.D. 475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 N.Y.S. 1126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/layden-v-knickerbocker-ice-co-nyappdiv-1914.