Lay Vs. Lay (Child Custody)
This text of 470 P.3d 213 (Lay Vs. Lay (Child Custody)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MYCHELLE LAY, No. 81494 Appellant, vs. ZACHARIAH LAY, FILED Respondent. AUG 2 8 2020 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY 6,NG-4-4.-Atay ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK
This appeal was docketed on July 22, 2020, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 10 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2). It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN
BY:
cc: Hon. Bryce C. Duckworth, District Judge, Family Court Division Mychelle Lay Zachariah Lay Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER
101- I 9d7 WOO
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
470 P.3d 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lay-vs-lay-child-custody-nev-2020.