Lay v. Romero

624 So. 2d 1202, 1993 La. LEXIS 3470, 1993 WL 427312

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 18, 1993·No. No. 93-C-1065·Published

Opinion

JOINT MOTION AND ORDER TO DISMISS

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintif^appellant, STEVEN R. LAY, and defendant/appellee, UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY, through their undersigned respective counsel, move this Honorable court to dismiss this appeal with full prejudice as between STEVEN R. LAY and UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY and at the cost of said defendant/appellee.

Respectfully submitted,

McBride, foret, rozas & LEONARD

Attorneys for DefendanVAppellee, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company

[1203]*1203BY: /s/ Norman P. Foret NORMAN P. FORET

ONEBANE, DONOHOE, BERNARD, TORIAN,

DIAZ, McNAMARA & ABELL Attorneys for PlaintiffAppellant, Steven R. Lay

BY: /s/ Robert M. Mahony ROBERT M. MAHONY

ORDER

Considering the foregoing motion:

IT IS ORDERED that the appeal of STEVEN R. LAY is dismissed at the cost of UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY.

/s/ Catherine D. Kimball Justice of the Supreme Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI