Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co.

146 P.2d 923, 63 Cal. App. 2d 452, 1944 Cal. App. LEXIS 963
California Court of Appeal·Decided March 23, 1944·No. Civ. No. 3121·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.

A petition for writ of supersedeas was filed by defendants and appellants pending the appeal in the above entitled case. An order to show cause was issued and pending the hearing thereof all proceedings on the judgment were stayed conditioned that defendants file a sufficient bond in the sum of $6828. Such a bond was filed. The appeal from the judgment was decided adversely to defendants. (Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co., Ltd,., 62 Cal.App.2d 233 [144 P.2d 395].) A hearing was subsequently denied by the Supreme Court. That judgment has become final. The question presented under the writ has become moot.

Petition dismissed.

Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co., 146 P.2d 923, 63 Cal. App. 2d 452, 1944 Cal. App. LEXIS 963 (Cal. Ct. App. 1944).

146 P.2d 923 (Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Field CA4/1
California Court of Appeal, 2013