Lay v. Krause

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lay v. Krause

353 So. 2d 149

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 1977·No. No. FF-93·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Honoring appellant’s request that we treat the notice of appeal as a petition for commonlaw certiorari, which we do, we nevertheless find from an examination of the record that we have no jurisdiction. (See Grandin Lake Shores Association, Inc. v. Underwood, 351 So.2d 1131 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Accordingly, the petition is

DISMISSED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Honoring appellant’s request that we treat the notice of appeal as a petition for commonlaw certiorari, which we do, we nevertheless find from an examination of the record that we have no jurisdiction. (See Grandin Lake Shores Association, Inc. v. Underwood, 351 So.2d 1131 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Accordingly, the petition is

DISMISSED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Lay v. Krause, 353 So. 2d 149 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

353 So. 2d 149 (Lay v. Krause) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related