Laxton v. Tilly
66 N.C. 327
Opinion
The maintenance of the plaintiff is not a charge upon the personalty of the estate of Levi. Laxton, dec’d, in the hands of the defendant his administrator, but it is a charge upon the land which Thomas Laxton sold to Levi Laxton, with the stipulation that Levi should support the plaintiff.
The judgment below will be modified in conformity with “this opinion, and the cause will be remanded, and this will be -certified.
J?ee OuRiam. Judgment modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Laxton v. Tilly, 66 N.C. 327 (N.C. 1872).
66 N.C. 327 (Laxton v. Tilly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. Tilley
190 S.E.2d 243 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
Minor v. Minor
62 S.E.2d 60 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
Bailey v. Federal Land Bank
8 S.E.2d 614 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Marsh v. . Marsh
158 S.E. 400 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Fleming v. . Motz
122 S.E. 369 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)
Bailey v. . Bailey
90 S.E. 803 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)
Helms v. Helms.
47 S.E. 415 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1904)
Stamper v. . Stamper
28 S.E. 20 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)