Home/New York Court of Appeals/Lax v. Herman

Lax v. Herman

199 N.E.2d 510, 14 N.Y.2d 748, 250 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1167
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 7, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 199 N.E.2d 510 (Lax v. Herman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lax v. Herman, 199 N.E.2d 510, 14 N.Y.2d 748, 250 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1167 (N.Y. 1964).

Opinion

Order reversed and matter remitted to Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum : In our opinion, the agreement was unambiguous and required compliance with certain conditions precedent specified therein. The record clearly shows that not all of the stated conditions were performed. Accordingly, the order appealed from should be reversed and summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff granted. The certified question is answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Scileppi. Taking no part: Judge Bergan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Slyke v. Pargas, Inc.
69 A.D.2d 927 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 N.E.2d 510, 14 N.Y.2d 748, 250 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lax-v-herman-ny-1964.