Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation v. Jeff Snyder, as of the Estate of James R. Snyder, and as the Representative, Shareholder and Director of Beach View Estates, Inc., on Behalf of Beach View Estates, Inc., and the Estate of James R. Snyder, Jeffrey C. Frahm and Kathleen M. Frahm
This text of Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation v. Jeff Snyder, as of the Estate of James R. Snyder, and as the Representative, Shareholder and Director of Beach View Estates, Inc., on Behalf of Beach View Estates, Inc., and the Estate of James R. Snyder, Jeffrey C. Frahm and Kathleen M. Frahm (Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation v. Jeff Snyder, as of the Estate of James R. Snyder, and as the Representative, Shareholder and Director of Beach View Estates, Inc., on Behalf of Beach View Estates, Inc., and the Estate of James R. Snyder, Jeffrey C. Frahm and Kathleen M. Frahm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBERS 13-10-00536-CV 13-10-00537-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
JEFF SNYDER, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES R. SNYDER, AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE, SHAREHOLDER AND DIRECTOR OF BEACH VIEW ESTATES, INC., ON BEHALF OF BEACH VIEW ESTATES, INC., AND THE ESTATE OF JAMES R. SNYDER, JEFFREY C. FRAHM AND KATHLEEN M. FRAHM, APPELLEES. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Lawyers Title Insurance Company, perfected appeals from judgments
entered by the County Court at Law No. 3 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number
02-62076-3. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeals on
grounds that appellant no longer wishes to prosecute the appeals. Appellant requests
that this Court dismiss the appeals.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s unopposed
motion to dismiss the appeals, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeals are
hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed
against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the
parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeals at
appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandates will
issue forthwith. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 6th day of October, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation v. Jeff Snyder, as of the Estate of James R. Snyder, and as the Representative, Shareholder and Director of Beach View Estates, Inc., on Behalf of Beach View Estates, Inc., and the Estate of James R. Snyder, Jeffrey C. Frahm and Kathleen M. Frahm, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawyers-title-insurance-corporation-v-jeff-snyder-as-of-the-estate-of-texapp-2011.