Lawyers Mortgage Co. v. De Waltoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lawyers Mortgage Co. v. De Waltoff

241 A.D. 699

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.D. 699 (Lawyers Mortgage Co. v. De Waltoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawyers Mortgage Co. v. De Waltoff, 241 A.D. 699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting receiver’s motion to compel appellants to pay and turn over to him the sum of $490 affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The Special Term, in its discretion, was free to decide, upon the [700]*700affidavits, the issue of fact in respect of fraud, no request for a reference respecting it having been made. Such an issue ordinarily should be determined upon a reference. Rule 74 of the Rules of Civil Practice regulates the form of the order. Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting receiver’s motion to compel appellants to pay and turn over to him the sum of $490 affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The Special Term, in its discretion, was free to decide, upon the [700]*700affidavits, the issue of fact in respect of fraud, no request for a reference respecting it having been made. Such an issue ordinarily should be determined upon a reference. Rule 74 of the Rules of Civil Practice regulates the form of the order. Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawyers-mortgage-co-v-de-waltoff-nyappdiv-1934.