Lawyers Co-Operative Pub. Co. v. Muething
602 N.E.2d 654, 65 Ohio St. 3d 1460, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 3535
Opinion
Hamilton County, No. C-900582. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to consider as additional authority, for his Propositions of Law, the case of Vandemark v. Southland Corp. (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 1, 525 N.E.2d 1374,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion to consider additional authority be, and the same is hereby, granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lawyers Co-Operative Pub. Co. v. Muething, 602 N.E.2d 654, 65 Ohio St. 3d 1460, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 3535 (Ohio 1992).
602 N.E.2d 654 (Lawyers Co-Operative Pub. Co. v. Muething) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vandemark v. Southland Corp.
525 N.E.2d 1374 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)