Lawyers Co-Operative Pub. Co. v. Muething

Ohio Supreme Court

Lawyers Co-Operative Pub. Co. v. Muething

602 N.E.2d 654, 65 Ohio St. 3d 1460, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 3535

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 20, 1992

Docket91-2273

StatusPublished

This text of 602 N.E.2d 654 (Lawyers Co-Operative Pub. Co. v. Muething) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawyers Co-Operative Pub. Co. v. Muething, 602 N.E.2d 654, 65 Ohio St. 3d 1460, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 3535 (Ohio 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton County, No. C-900582. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to consider as additional authority, for his Propositions of Law, the case of Vandemark v. Southland Corp. (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 1, 525 N.E.2d 1374,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion to consider additional authority be, and the same is hereby, granted.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton County, No. C-900582. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to consider as additional authority, for his Propositions of Law, the case of Vandemark v. Southland Corp. (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 1, 525 N.E.2d 1374,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion to consider additional authority be, and the same is hereby, granted.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

602 N.E.2d 654, 65 Ohio St. 3d 1460, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 3535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawyers-co-operative-pub-co-v-muething-ohio-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack