Lawyer v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

434 F. App'x 240
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 27, 2011·No. No. 10-1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ state law and Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219 (West 1998 & Supp. 2010) claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Lawyer v. Verizon Commc’ns, Inc., No. 8:10-cv-01287-RWT (D.Md. July 28, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawyer v. Verizon Communications, Inc., 434 F. App'x 240 (4th Cir. 2011).

434 F. App'x 240 (Lawyer v. Verizon Communications, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawyer v. Verizon Communications, Inc.
181 L. Ed. 2d 262 (Supreme Court, 2011)