Lawyer v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

434 F. App'x 240
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 27, 2011
DocketNo. 10-1996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 434 F. App'x 240 (Lawyer v. Verizon Communications, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawyer v. Verizon Communications, Inc., 434 F. App'x 240 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ state law and Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219 (West 1998 & Supp. 2010) claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Lawyer v. Verizon Commc’ns, Inc., No. 8:10-cv-01287-RWT (D.Md. July 28, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawyer v. Verizon Communications, Inc.
181 L. Ed. 2d 262 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
434 F. App'x 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawyer-v-verizon-communications-inc-ca4-2011.