Lawton v. State

37 So. 3d 903, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6961, 2010 WL 1794166
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lawton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3500
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 6, 2010·No. 1D09-5583·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s four postconviction motions. However, the lower court also entered an order barring any further pro se pleadings. If a court wishes to bar a defendant from filing further pro se motions, it must issue a show cause order to provide the defendant with notice and an opportunity to respond. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999). Accordingly, we reverse the lower court’s order barring pro se pleadings, and remand for the court to comply with' the requirements of Spencer.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED.

HAWKES, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawton v. State, 37 So. 3d 903, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6961, 2010 WL 1794166 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

37 So. 3d 903 (Lawton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)