Lawton v. Flynt

Fourth Circuit

Lawton v. Flynt

112 F. App'x 312

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 10, 2004·No. No. 04-7515·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Donald E. Lawton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lawton v. Flynt, No. CA-03-734-3 (E.D.Va. Sept. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Donald E. Lawton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lawton v. Flynt, No. CA-03-734-3 (E.D.Va. Sept. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Lawton v. Flynt, 112 F. App'x 312 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

112 F. App'x 312 (Lawton v. Flynt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related