Lawton v. Flynt
This text of Lawton v. Flynt (Lawton v. Flynt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7515
DONALD E. LAWTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPUTY FLYNT, Grievance; SERGEANT HALL; LIEUTENANT CHAPLIN; MAJOR PINSON; KATHY MCDOUGAL, Grievance; SHERIFF ARTHUR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (CA-03-734-3)
Submitted: November 4, 2004 Decided: November 10, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Lawton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Donald E. Lawton appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Lawton v. Flynt, No. CA-03-734-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 1,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lawton v. Flynt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawton-v-flynt-ca4-2004.