Lawton Grain Co. v. Brunswig

1919 OK 83, 179 P. 465, 72 Okla. 136, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 328
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided March 11, 1919·No. 10358·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HARDY, C. J.

Defendant in error filed motion to dismiss this proceeding for the reason that errors assigned do not appear upon the face of the record proper ana are not preserved by case-made or bill of exceptions. Appeal is perfected by transcript, and no bill of exceptions or case-made was 'served, allowed, or filed, and the errors alleged'are of such' character that they cannot be reviewed in this court upon transcript of the ' record. Simpson v. Henderson-Sturges Piano Co.; 31 Okla. 623, 122 Pae. 174; Ston-breaker-Zea Cattle Co. v. Hilton, 34 Okla. 225. 124 Pac. 1062; Laborn et al. v. Stephens et al., 47 Okla. 64, 147 Pac. 152; Jacobs v. ■Willie, 47 Okla. 785, 150 Pac. 709.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawton Grain Co. v. Brunswig, 1919 OK 83, 179 P. 465, 72 Okla. 136, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 328 (Okla. 1919).

1919 OK 83 (Lawton Grain Co. v. Brunswig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edgerly v. Johnson
1920 OK 278 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
Folsom v. Billy
1920 OK 166 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)