Lawson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Lawson v. State

1923 OK CR 43, 212 P. 1116, 23 Okla. Crim. 17, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 158

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 3, 1923

DocketNo. A-3995.

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK CR 43 (Lawson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawson v. State, 1923 OK CR 43, 212 P. 1116, 23 Okla. Crim. 17, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 158 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Winford Lawson, was convicted on a charge of unlawfully selling one quart of whis-ky to Luther Murley, and 'in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined' for 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $50., From the judgment rendered on the verdict', an appeal was perfected by) filing in this court on June 7, 1921, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed and no appearance made in behalf of plaintiff in error in this court. When the case was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute' the appeal. An examination of the record fails to disclose anyi error of which the plaintiff in error has any just right to complain. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Winford Lawson, was convicted on a charge of unlawfully selling one quart of whis-ky to Luther Murley, and 'in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined' for 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $50., From the judgment rendered on the verdict', an appeal was perfected by) filing in this court on June 7, 1921, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed and no appearance made in behalf of plaintiff in error in this court. When the case was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute' the appeal. An examination of the record fails to disclose anyi error of which the plaintiff in error has any just right to complain. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK CR 43, 212 P. 1116, 23 Okla. Crim. 17, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawson-v-state-oklacrimapp-1923.