Lawson v. State

122 S.E. 93, 31 Ga. App. 764, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 174
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 6, 1924
Docket15187
StatusPublished

This text of 122 S.E. 93 (Lawson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawson v. State, 122 S.E. 93, 31 Ga. App. 764, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 174 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Lawson was convicted of violating the prohibition statute. The conviction was authorized by the evidence. In fact, when the officers were searching his premises and just before locating several gallons of beer and part of an apparatus for the manufacture of whisky, the defendant, according to the testimony of one witness said to him, “I have got a little outfit here, but I haven’t used it in God knows when.” The grounds of the motion for a new trial which have the approval of the trial judge are without substantial merit. Eor no reason pointed out did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 S.E. 93, 31 Ga. App. 764, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawson-v-state-gactapp-1924.