Lawson v. State
This text of 610 So. 2d 714 (Lawson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction for the sale or delivery of cocaine. However, we agree with appellant that the trial court erred by failing to make specific findings required under the habitual offender statute. Van Bryant v. State, 602 So.2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s sentence as a habitual offender and remand this matter to the trial court for resentencing. On remand, the trial court may. again sentence appellant as a habitual offender upon making the requisite findings as required by section 775.084(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
610 So. 2d 714, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13544, 1992 WL 379852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawson-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.