Lawson v. State

610 So. 2d 714, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13544, 1992 WL 379852
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 23, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1864
StatusPublished

This text of 610 So. 2d 714 (Lawson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawson v. State, 610 So. 2d 714, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13544, 1992 WL 379852 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for the sale or delivery of cocaine. However, we agree with appellant that the trial court erred by failing to make specific findings required under the habitual offender statute. Van Bryant v. State, 602 So.2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s sentence as a habitual offender and remand this matter to the trial court for resentencing. On remand, the trial court may. again sentence appellant as a habitual offender upon making the requisite findings as required by section 775.084(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1991).

DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., and ALDERMAN, JAMES E., Senior Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Bryant v. State
602 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
610 So. 2d 714, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13544, 1992 WL 379852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawson-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.