Lawson v. State

141 So. 922, 25 Ala. App. 651
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 16, 1932·No. 8 Div. 510.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

RICE, J.

In this case we have considered “all questions apparent on the record or reserved by bill of exceptions” (Code 1923, § 3258), which are few in number.

In addition, we have given attention to all that is said in brief filed here on behalf of appellant.

We are able to observe no question worthy of comment; counsel, in said brief, have pointed out none.

Obviously, there was no prejudicially erroneous ruling made during the disposition of the charge against appellant, nor, in the manner of its inception.

Everything is regular, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawson v. State, 141 So. 922, 25 Ala. App. 651 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).

141 So. 922 (Lawson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawson v. State
141 So. 917 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)