Lawson v. Spartanburg County Detention Facility
This text of 128 F. App'x 325 (Lawson v. Spartanburg County Detention Facility) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Steven P. Lawson appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to reconsider its earlier order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. Heyman v. M.L. Mktg. Co., 116 F.3d 91, 94 (4th Cir.1997). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lawson v. Spartanburg County Detention Facility, No. CA-02-3930-3-24BC (D.S.C. Nov. 12, 2004). Lawson’s motion to stay or remand this appeal is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 F. App'x 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawson-v-spartanburg-county-detention-facility-ca4-2005.