Lawson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedMarch 18, 2025
Docket24-0056V
StatusUnpublished

This text of Lawson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Lawson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2025).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-0056V

ANITA LAWSON, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, v. Filed: February 7, 2025

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Elizabeth Hess, Shannon Law Group, Woodridge, IL, for Petitioner.

Michael Bliley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

On January 17, 2024, Anita Lawson filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). On October 5, 2022, Petitioner received an influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which vaccine is listed in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a). Petitioner alleges that she sustained a Table shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) within the time period set forth in the Table following administration of the vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that she experienced residual effects of this injury for more than six months.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Respondent denies that Petitioner sustained a Table SIRVA injury; denies that the flu vaccine caused Petitioner’s alleged SIRVA, or any other injury; and denies that Petitioner’s current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.

Nevertheless, on February 7, 2025, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation,3 stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $17,500.00, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 In attaching the parties’ joint stipulation, I have omitted the last page – an RSign form that includes personal information regarding Petitioner. 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

ANITA LAWSON,

Petitioner,

V. No. 24-56V Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Anita Lawson ("petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of an influenza ("flu") vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"), 42

C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received a flu vaccination on October 5, 2022.

3. The flu vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she sustained a Table shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration ("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table following administration

of the vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of this

condition for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil

action for damages on her behalf as a result of her condition.

ENV50715821-5168-EABE-8141-FFCF 02/03/2025 19:15 PM UTC

• 6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the

flu vaccine caused petitioner's alleged SIRVA, or any other injury; and denies that petitioner's

current condition is a sequelac of a vaccine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that

the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent

with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive

compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 1(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human

Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of$17,500.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.

This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa- l 5(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and

after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 l(a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings

before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding

upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- l5(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be

expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or

2 ENV50715821 -5168-EABE-8141-FFCF 02/03/2025 19:15 PM UTC State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i)
§ 300aa-2
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lawson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawson-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2025.