Lawson v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Lawson v. Peterson

759 P.2d 336, 92 Or. App. 701

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 24, 1988

Docket87-C-11105; CA A46580

StatusPublished

This text of 759 P.2d 336 (Lawson v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawson v. Peterson, 759 P.2d 336, 92 Or. App. 701 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner, an inmate at Oregon State Correctional Institute (OSCI), filed this habeas corpus action, alleging that the 20-minute exercise periods allowed each weekday in the administrative segregation section of OSCI are inadequate and, therefore, unlawful conditions of confinement. Petitioner, however, has been out of administrative segregation since November, 1987. The appeal, therefore, is moot.

Appeal dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner, an inmate at Oregon State Correctional Institute (OSCI), filed this habeas corpus action, alleging that the 20-minute exercise periods allowed each weekday in the administrative segregation section of OSCI are inadequate and, therefore, unlawful conditions of confinement. Petitioner, however, has been out of administrative segregation since November, 1987. The appeal, therefore, is moot.

Appeal dismissed as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

759 P.2d 336, 92 Or. App. 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawson-v-peterson-orctapp-1988.