Lawson v. Lawson
86 S.E.2d 77, 241 N.C. 570, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 418
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lawson v. Lawson. Read the opinion of the Court — 244 N.C. 689 →
Opinion
A study of the evidence shows that the court’s findings of fact are supported by competent evidence, and that théy are sufficient to sustain the judgment based thereon. Woody v. Barnett, 239 N.C. 420, 79 S.E. 2d 789; McLean v. McLean, 233 N.C. 139, 63. S.E. 2d 138. It would seem that the exceptions to the findings of fact are tbo general and indefinite to bring up for review the findings of the court.’ Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577, 58 S.E. 2d 351.
The judgment of the Superior Court is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lawson v. Lawson, 86 S.E.2d 77, 241 N.C. 570, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 418 (N.C. 1955).
86 S.E.2d 77 (Lawson v. Lawson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McLean v. McLean
63 S.E.2d 138 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Woody v. Barnett
79 S.E.2d 789 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Town of Burnsville v. Boone
58 S.E.2d 351 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)