Lawson v. Lawson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Lawson v. Lawson

86 S.E.2d 77, 241 N.C. 570, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 418

DecidedMarch 2, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 86 S.E.2d 77 (Lawson v. Lawson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawson v. Lawson, 86 S.E.2d 77, 241 N.C. 570, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 418 (N.C. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A study of the evidence shows that the court’s findings of fact are supported by competent evidence, and that théy are sufficient to sustain the judgment based thereon. Woody v. Barnett, 239 N.C. 420, 79 S.E. 2d 789; McLean v. McLean, 233 N.C. 139, 63. S.E. 2d 138. It would seem that the exceptions to the findings of fact are tbo general and indefinite to bring up for review the findings of the court.’ Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577, 58 S.E. 2d 351.

The judgment of the Superior Court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A study of the evidence shows that the court’s findings of fact are supported by competent evidence, and that théy are sufficient to sustain the judgment based thereon. Woody v. Barnett, 239 N.C. 420, 79 S.E. 2d 789; McLean v. McLean, 233 N.C. 139, 63. S.E. 2d 138. It would seem that the exceptions to the findings of fact are tbo general and indefinite to bring up for review the findings of the court.’ Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577, 58 S.E. 2d 351.

The judgment of the Superior Court is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 S.E.2d 77, 241 N.C. 570, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawson-v-lawson-nc-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack