Lawson v. KREATIVE CHILD CARE CENTER, INC.

717 N.W.2d 340, 475 Mich. 908
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 21, 2006·No. 130872·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

717 N.W.2d 340 (2006)
475 Mich. 908

Deserai LAWSON, Next Friend of Zhimon Bingham, a Minor, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
KREATIVE CHILD CARE CENTER, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 130872. COA No. 256388.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 21, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address only the issue whether the statements made by plaintiff's son to plaintiff, identifying his attacker, and then repeated by plaintiff to her son's physician, are admissible under MRE 803(4) as "[s]tatements made for the purposes of medical treatment or diagnosis. . . ." The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting a mere restatement of the arguments made in their application papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawson v. KREATIVE CHILD CARE CENTER, INC., 717 N.W.2d 340, 475 Mich. 908 (Mich. 2006).

717 N.W.2d 340 (Lawson v. KREATIVE CHILD CARE CENTER, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Howard J. Stoddard Trust
717 N.W.2d 340 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)