Lawson v. Ivashuk

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lawson v. Ivashuk

974 So. 2d 522, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 1375, 2008 WL 313798

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 6, 2008

DocketNo. 4D07-2281

StatusPublished

This text of 974 So. 2d 522 (Lawson v. Ivashuk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawson v. Ivashuk, 974 So. 2d 522, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 1375, 2008 WL 313798 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Tyson v. Fla. Bar, 826 So.2d 265, 268 (Fla.2002) (“Disciplinary proceedings against attorneys are instituted in the public interest and to preserve the purity of the courts. No private rights except those of the accused attorney are involved.”); Cole v. Owens, 766 So.2d 287, 288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (As an official arm of the supreme court, the Florida Bar and its employees enjoy absolute immunity for actions taken within the scope of their duties.).

WARNER, FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Tyson v. Fla. Bar, 826 So.2d 265, 268 (Fla.2002) (“Disciplinary proceedings against attorneys are instituted in the public interest and to preserve the purity of the courts. No private rights except those of the accused attorney are involved.”); Cole v. Owens, 766 So.2d 287, 288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (As an official arm of the supreme court, the Florida Bar and its employees enjoy absolute immunity for actions taken within the scope of their duties.).

WARNER, FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

974 So. 2d 522, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 1375, 2008 WL 313798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawson-v-ivashuk-fladistctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack