Lawson v. Howard Systems International
This text of 23 A.D.3d 177 (Lawson v. Howard Systems International) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered August 2, 2004, which, in an action for employment discrimination on the basis of race, insofar as appealed from as limited by plaintiffs brief, denied plaintiffs motion pursuant to Judiciary Law § 519 to hold defendants in criminal contempt for having terminated plaintiffs employment on account of his absence from work by reason of jury service, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Even assuming the claim was properly entertained as an unpleaded cause of action, the motion was properly denied. No private cause of action exists under Judiciary Law § 519 (Gomariz v Foote, Cone & Belding Communications, 228 AD2d 316 [1996] ). Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 A.D.3d 177, 802 N.Y.S.2d 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawson-v-howard-systems-international-nyappdiv-2005.