Laws v. State

164 S.W. 1015, 73 Tex. Crim. 286, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 679
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 10, 1913
DocketNo. 2841.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 164 S.W. 1015 (Laws v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laws v. State, 164 S.W. 1015, 73 Tex. Crim. 286, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 679 (Tex. 1913).

Opinions

PRENDER GAST, Presiding Judge.

From a conviction of aggravated assault with a fine of $200 appellant prosecutes this appeal.

There is in the record what purports to be a statement of facts and *287 some bills of exception, but neither of them show to have been filed in the lower court. The Assistant Attorney-General on that account makes the point that they can not be considered, which is correct. There is no question raised by the motion for new trial which can be reviewed, without a statement of facts, or bills of exception.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lay and Jones v. State
198 S.W. 291 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Sorrell v. State
186 S.W. 336 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
McGee v. State
183 S.W. 309 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 S.W. 1015, 73 Tex. Crim. 286, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laws-v-state-texcrimapp-1913.