Laws v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Laws v. State

164 S.W. 1015, 73 Tex. Crim. 286, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 679

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 10, 1913·No. No. 2841.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

PRENDER GAST, Presiding Judge.

From a conviction of aggravated assault with a fine of $200 appellant prosecutes this appeal.

There is in the record what purports to be a statement of facts and *287 some bills of exception, but neither of them show to have been filed in the lower court. The Assistant Attorney-General on that account makes the point that they can not be considered, which is correct. There is no question raised by the motion for new trial which can be reviewed, without a statement of facts, or bills of exception.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRENDER GAST, Presiding Judge.

From a conviction of aggravated assault with a fine of $200 appellant prosecutes this appeal.

There is in the record what purports to be a statement of facts and *287 some bills of exception, but neither of them show to have been filed in the lower court. The Assistant Attorney-General on that account makes the point that they can not be considered, which is correct. There is no question raised by the motion for new trial which can be reviewed, without a statement of facts, or bills of exception.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed. ■

Laws v. State, 164 S.W. 1015, 73 Tex. Crim. 286, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 679 (Tex. 1913).

Pincite

164 S.W. 1015 (Laws v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related