Laws v. Henrock Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Laws v. Henrock Realty Corp.

82 A.D.2d 797

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 82 A.D.2d 797 (Laws v. Henrock Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Laws v. Henrock Realty Corp., 82 A.D.2d 797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a vendee for specific performance of a real estate contract, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), entered October 17,1980, which is in favor of defendants upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of the plaintiff’s case. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted with costs to abide the event. A vendee is entitled to specific performance where the defect in the vendor’s title has been corrected by the time the judgment is rendered (Haffey v Lynch, 143 NY 241; see 5 Warren’s Weed, New York Real Property, Specific [798]*798Performance, § 9.05; Harvey, Law of Real Property and Title Closing, § 566; 62 NY Jur, Vendor and Purchaser, § 189, p 490). Rabin, J.P., Cohalan, Weinstein and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a vendee for specific performance of a real estate contract, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), entered October 17,1980, which is in favor of defendants upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of the plaintiff’s case. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted with costs to abide the event. A vendee is entitled to specific performance where the defect in the vendor’s title has been corrected by the time the judgment is rendered (Haffey v Lynch, 143 NY 241; see 5 Warren’s Weed, New York Real Property, Specific [798]*798Performance, § 9.05; Harvey, Law of Real Property and Title Closing, § 566; 62 NY Jur, Vendor and Purchaser, § 189, p 490). Rabin, J.P., Cohalan, Weinstein and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A.D.2d 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laws-v-henrock-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack