Lawrence Woods v. Michael A. Sheely

Fourth Circuit

Lawrence Woods v. Michael A. Sheely

25 F.3d 1042, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20892, 1994 WL 251165

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 1994

Docket94-1252

StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1042 (Lawrence Woods v. Michael A. Sheely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawrence Woods v. Michael A. Sheely, 25 F.3d 1042, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20892, 1994 WL 251165 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

25 F.3d 1042
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Lawrence WOODS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Michael A. SHEELY, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-1252.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 24, 1994.
Decided: June 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-93-260)

Lawrence Woods, Appellant Pro Se.

E. Fitzgerald Parnell, III, Weinstein & Sturges, P.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing Appellant's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Woods v. Sheely, No. CA-93-260 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

25 F.3d 1042
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Lawrence WOODS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Michael A. SHEELY, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-1252.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 24, 1994.
Decided: June 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-93-260)

Lawrence Woods, Appellant Pro Se.

E. Fitzgerald Parnell, III, Weinstein & Sturges, P.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing Appellant's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Woods v. Sheely, No. CA-93-260 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 F.3d 1042, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20892, 1994 WL 251165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-woods-v-michael-a-sheely-ca4-1994.