Lawrence v. Van De Mar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lawrence v. Van De Mar

9 A.D.2d 726, 192 N.Y.S.2d 189, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6388

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 726 (Lawrence v. Van De Mar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawrence v. Van De Mar, 9 A.D.2d 726, 192 N.Y.S.2d 189, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6388 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Order insofar as it sets aside the verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant Levy reversed on the law and facts, and verdicts reinstated, with costs to the plaintiffs against the defendant Levy. Memorandum: The finding that Levy was guilty of negligence contributing to the occurrence of the accident was not against the weight of evidence. All concur. Order insofar as it sets aside the verdicts of no cause of action in the action by the plaintiffs against the defendants Van De Mar affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The finding that the Van De Mars were not guilty of negligence contributing to the occurrence of the accident was against the weight of evidence. All concur, except Bastow, J., who dissents and votes to reverse the order and reinstate the [727]*727verdicts. (Appeals from an order of Monroe Trial Term setting aside the verdict in favor of defendants Van De Mar of no cause of action and also setting aside the verdicts in favor of plaintiffs Lawrence against Morton Levy and granting a new trial.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Halpern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order insofar as it sets aside the verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant Levy reversed on the law and facts, and verdicts reinstated, with costs to the plaintiffs against the defendant Levy. Memorandum: The finding that Levy was guilty of negligence contributing to the occurrence of the accident was not against the weight of evidence. All concur. Order insofar as it sets aside the verdicts of no cause of action in the action by the plaintiffs against the defendants Van De Mar affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The finding that the Van De Mars were not guilty of negligence contributing to the occurrence of the accident was against the weight of evidence. All concur, except Bastow, J., who dissents and votes to reverse the order and reinstate the [727]*727verdicts. (Appeals from an order of Monroe Trial Term setting aside the verdict in favor of defendants Van De Mar of no cause of action and also setting aside the verdicts in favor of plaintiffs Lawrence against Morton Levy and granting a new trial.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Halpern, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 726, 192 N.Y.S.2d 189, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-van-de-mar-nyappdiv-1959.