Lawrence v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lawrence v. State

399 S.W.3d 40, 2013 WL 1211145, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 370

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 26, 2013·No. No. ED 99013·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Edward Lawrence appeals the denial of his Motion to Reopen his previous motion for post-conviction relief, filed under Mo. R.Crim. P. 27.26 (1986). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Edward Lawrence appeals the denial of his Motion to Reopen his previous motion for post-conviction relief, filed under Mo. R.Crim. P. 27.26 (1986). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Lawrence v. State, 399 S.W.3d 40, 2013 WL 1211145, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 370 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

399 S.W.3d 40 (Lawrence v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.