Lawrence v. State

409 S.E.2d 661, 261 Ga. 647, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 856
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 1, 1991
DocketS91A1197
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 409 S.E.2d 661 (Lawrence v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence v. State, 409 S.E.2d 661, 261 Ga. 647, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 856 (Ga. 1991).

Opinion

Benham, Justice.

This appeal is from appellant’s conviction for felony murder.1 [648]*648Appellant’s sole contention on appeal is that the evidence was not sufficient to warrant his conviction.

Decided November 1, 1991. Murray M. Silver, for appellant. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, Rebecca A. Keel, Assistant District Attorneys, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Susan V. Boleyn, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Peggy R. Katz, Staff Attorney, for appellee.

The evidence at trial authorized the jury to find the following facts. Appellant was living with the victim’s sister. On the day of the shooting, the victim, her brother, and a friend came to appellant’s apartment where the victim’s brother assaulted appellant for alleged mistreatment of appellant’s companion. The brother was removed from the apartment, but threatened appellant with further violence before leaving. Appellant also left. When the victim, her brother, and their friend arrived at the victim’s family home, appellant arrived immediately behind them and stopped his car across the street. As the victim’s brother crossed the street toward appellant’s car, appellant exited the car with a gun 2 in his hand. Appellant fired three shots, one into the air, one into the ground, and a third which struck the victim, killing her and the fetus she was carrying. Appellant then walked to his car and left the scene. Prior to these events, appellant had been convicted of several felonies.

Although appellant told a version of the same story which featured his fear of assault by the victim’s brother and asserted that only one shot was fired by accident in the process of blocking a blow from the victim’s brother, credibility is a matter for the factfinder (Pless v. State, 260 Ga. 96 (1) (390 SE2d 40) (1990)), and it is evident from the verdict that the jury’s assessment of credibility was adverse to appellant. The evidence adduced at trial authorized a rational trier of fact to find appellant guilty of felony murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Brand v. State, 258 Ga. 378 (369 SE2d 896) (1988); Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gregory v. Sexual Offender Registration Review Board
784 S.E.2d 392 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2016)
Stowe v. State
536 S.E.2d 506 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
409 S.E.2d 661, 261 Ga. 647, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-state-ga-1991.